Back to Christian Perring's Home Page

 

PHL 1001C Western Philosophy 1  Honors Section

KSC 104   CRN  98890

 

Dr Christian Perring, Department of Philosophy, Dowling College

 

MW 10:00-11:20AM, Fall 2006

 

E-mail: perringc (at) dowling (dot) edu  [All email to me should have "PHL1001" in the subject line: you need to use your Dowling email account to write to me]

Office Phone: 244-3349

Office: 330B RC (next to the computer lab)

Office Hours: 11:30AM-2:30PM MW, 1:00-2:00PM T

 

Textbooks:

·         A Passion for Wisdom: Readings in Western Philosophy on Love and Desire, edited by Ellen Feder, Karmen MacKendrick and Sybol Cook (Pearson Prentice Hall, 2004)

·         Homer, The Iliad, trans. by Stanley Lombardo (Hackett, 2000)

·         Sophocles, Antigone, trans. by Paul Woodruff (Hackett, 2001)

·         Any version of the Bible (I suggest using a Study Bible).

 

Grade assignment:

First paper: 12%

Second paper: 24%

Third paper: 36%

Attendance and participation: 10%

Presentation: 8%

Personal reflections (4): 10%

 

Aim of the course: This course will introduce you to some of the central philosophical themes in western thought from ancient Greece up to the dawn of the modern era.  You will learn skills of reading carefully, reading out loud, comparing different world views, analyzing arguments, clarifying ideas, making careful distinctions, finding the strengths and weaknesses of arguments, assessing the plausibility of claims, constructing your own arguments, defending and strengthening your own arguments, discussing controversial ideas with other people, presenting ideas to a group, expressing your ideas and criticisms of others in writing, and formulating your own arguments in writing.  Ultimately, this course should help you to think for yourself, express yourself, and better understand the ideas of other people.  Hopefully, it should also give you some understanding of the philosophical foundations of western civilization. 

 

Reading assignments: Each week, one chapter, or part of a chapter, of the textbook is assigned for reading.  You must do the reading before that week.  You should be familiar with the main ideas in each assigned chapter, and you should make notes of those parts that are hard to follow. 

 

Attendance: If you need to miss a class, you should notify me by phone or email before the class.  Your attendance grade will suffer significantly if you miss classes without excuse.  If you miss classes, you can do a make-up by writing a 500 word summary of the assigned reading for the day you missed.

 

Participation: You should participate in class discussion, both answering questions that are put to the class, raising questions when you do not fully understand an idea or a part of the text, or what someone in the class says. 

 

Paper Topics (Tentative and subject to revision)

Paper 1.  At least 600 words.

Paper 2.  At least 1200 words.  Answer ONE question.  You should find at least one academic source of information that is not part of the assigned reading.

  1. Discuss what kind of questioning Socrates engages in when talking with other people, and consider the ways his influence on others may be positive or negative. 
  2. Set out two competing views of love in the Symposium, and explain the arguments given for them.  Discuss whether these arguments are convincing.

Late papers risk penalties.

Paper 3.  At least 1800 words.  Answer ONE question.  You should find at least two academic sources of information that is not part of the assigned reading.

Draft due on 11/29.  The draft can be 1200 words or more.  Penalty for not doing draft: paper grade goes down by one letter grade.

Final paper due 12/18.  Penalty for late papers.  5% per day late.

Topics for final paper. 

1.  Compare Aristotle's view of friendship with EITHER the Epicurean view OR the Stoic view.  Evaluate which is the better argued view. 

2.  Discuss why Augustine is confessing.  Compare this with the role of confession in a non-Christian religion, such as Judaism, Buddhism, Islam or Hinduism. 

3.  Aquinas discusses the difference between God's love and most human love.  He argues that God's love has to be different from human love because God has a different nature.  Explain how Aquinas makes those arguments, and then discuss whether his arguments are strong. 

4.   "Jesus in the New Testament commands people to love their enemies.  1.  What reasons, if any, does he give for saying people should do this?  Are they good reasons?  2.  Suggest a model of love that Jesus may be using, or one that we could find, for it to be psychologically possible for us to love our enemies?  3.  Is this model of love a new one or is it similar to the models of love used by Aristotle, the Epicureans, or the Stoics (explore just one of these)."  [Here's the basic issue: is love a thought, a feeling, an action, or something else?  Is Jesus telling people to feel loving towards people, to act in a loving way towards them, or to more intellectually wish them well. ]

 

Plagiarism detection and prevention: All papers should be submitted via Turnitin.com or sent to me by email as an attachment in MS Word or RTF.  I will give you information about how to use Turnitin.com.  Note that I view any form of academic dishonesty very seriously, and if I find that you have engaged in any significant form of plagiarism or cheating I will fail you in this course and report my action to the Dean of Students.  See the Dowling College Library page for Avoiding Plagiariam.

The class ID for turnitin.com is "???????" [to be announced later]

Password: "socrates"

 

Presentations:  You must sign up to do a presentation in by the end of the Week 6.  You can do a 10-minute presentation on your own, or a 20-minute presentation with another person.  If you do a joint presentation, you will both get the same grade.  You can use Powerpoint to do your presentation, but it is not required.  However you do your presentation, you must keep it lively and interesting, and you should not simply read out from a pre-written text.  You should provide some information that is not available in the course textbook.  Your presentation will be assessed using the form available by clicking here.  For your presentation topic, you can choose one from the schedule below, or you can propose a topic to me.  Note that your presentation should leave two minutes at the end for a question and answer period. 

 

Personal Reflections: These should be at least 500 words, in grammatical English.  They will not be graded, but I will give you some feedback on them.  You either get credit for them or you don't.  They are not meant to be academically challenging, but are meant to give you the opportunity to link the topics of the class to your own life and ideas you have about how best to make decisions.  It is up to you how much of your own personal experience you include, but you are encouraged to do so link your own life with philosophical discussions.

 

Classroom Etiquette. 

·         All cell phones ringers should be turned off and you should never talk or text on your cell phone in class. 

·         You should not eat any food in class, especially food that others will notice through sound or smell. 

·         You should turn up on time to all classes. 

·         Even if you are tired, you should stay awake and keep your eyes open.  Your attention needs to be on the class, and you should not do other reading or work during the class. 

·         You are free to express your views and question the views of others, including your professor, and you can be passionate about your opinions.  However, you must always treat others in the class with respect; you can criticize the views and arguments of others, but you cannot criticize them as persons.  You should also make sure you are not dominating classroom discussion to the exclusion of other class members. 

·         You have a responsibility to contribute to the community of the class.  You should  participate and help your classmates to understand ideas.

 

 

Tentative Schedule

 

 

Date

Topic

Reading Assigned

Presentation Topic

Work Due

Wed 9/6

Introduction

 

 

Self-Info Sheet

Mon 9/11

Greek Epic Poetry

The Iliad

Read the following parts:

Book 1

Book 2, lines 1-54, 226-300, 472-521, 873-932

Book 3

Book 6, lines 103-end

Book 9, lines 186-end

Book 12, lines 259-end

Book 16, lines 1-430, 455-586, 667-end

Book 18, lines 1-259, 504-end

Book 19, lines 1-87, 294-end

Book 22

Book 23, lines 1-282

Book 24, lines 497-end

 

Links to useful sites:

Study Guides:

 

 

 

W 9/13

 

The Iliad

 

 

M 9/18

Greek Tragedy

Sophocles: Antigone

Links:

 

The story of Oedipus

 

W 9/20

 

Antigone

What was Ancient Greek Theatre like and what role did it play in Athenian life?

First reflection: Are the dramas of Homer or Sophocles similar to or different from those that grip the general public now?

M 9/25

The Archaic Lyric

Sappho

The rise and fall of Greek civilization

 

W 9/27

The Birth of Philosophy

Empedocles

Who was Thales, and why is he described as the first scientist?

 

W 10/4

Socrates

Plato: The Apology

Links to the Jowett translation:

 

James Redfield translation (in Adobe Acrobat)

 

What was Athens like during the time of Socrates?

First paper due, by midnight.  At least 600 words.  Topic: Using either the Iliad or Antigone, discuss what motivates one of the major figures in the drama.  For example, why does Achilles fight Hector, or why does Antigone bury her brother?  Pay particular attention to the character’s values, and what kinds of love are involved.

M 10/9

 

The Apology

The war between Athens and Sparta.

 

W 10/11

Plato

The Symposium

Explain the Allegory of the Cave as it appears in Plato's Republic

 

M 10/16

 

The Symposium

What was pederasty in Ancient Greece?

 

W 10/18

Aristotle

from Nichomachean Ethics

The lives of Plato and Aristotle

Second reflection.  Whose view of love and friendship in the Symposium do you like the most?  Explain.

M 10/23

 

from Nichomachean Ethics

 

 

W 10/25

Epicurus

from Letter to Menoceus

The life of Epicurus

 

M 10/30

Marcus Aurelius

from Meditations

A sketch of the rise of the Roman empire.

 

W 11/1

Old Testament

Genesis

Scholarly theories on who wrote the Bible

Second paper due.  See topics listed above.

M 11/6

 

Exodus

The Dead Sea Scrolls: What are they?

 

W 11/8

New Testament

Book of Matthew

The Book of Judas -- What is it, and what does it say?

 

M 11/13

Plotinus

from Enneads

 

Third reflection.  Topic: Is there a rational way to interpret the messages and pronouncements of the Bible, or does interpretation have to be arbitrary, selective, and entirely subjective?  It would be best to focus on particular interpretive controversies, such as whether there are one or two creation stories in the book of Genesis, whether the Bible recommends violence or pacifism in dealing with enemies, whether masturbation, contraception, abortion and homosexual behavior are sins, or whether, as Jehovah's Witnesses believe, having a blood transfusion will prevent you from ever entering heaven.

W 11/15

Saint Augustine

from Confessions

The life of Saint Augustine

 

M 11/20

 

from Confessions

The rise of the early Christian Church

 

M 11/27

Saint Thomas Aquinas

from the Summa Theologica

The life of Saint Thomas Aquinas

 

W 11/29

 

from the Summa Theologica

 

Draft of final paper due

M 12/4

Hadewijch

from her letters, poetry and visions

 

 

W 12/6

Heloise and Abelard

from the Letters of Heloise and Abelard

The lives of Heloise and Abelard

 

M 12/11

Saint Teresa of Avila

from the Life of Saint Teresa of Avila by Herself and The Way of Perfection

The life of Saint Teresa of Avila

Fourth reflection.  Topic: Is it good to be rational?  Should rationality be the only guide to life or should there be a place for faith or non-rational experiences?

W 12/13

Saint John of the Cross

from Dark Night of the Soul

 

 

M 12/18

Montaigne

Of Friendship

The life of Montaigne

Final paper due

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Links to Internet Resources

 

 

Ancient Greek philosophy

 

In discussing the Epicureans, we talked about the fear of death and the pain of losing loved ones.  There is an interview with Julia Sweeny on NPR's Fresh Air in which she talks about her religious experience, her loss of faith, and her feelings about coping with loss. 

 

Here's an interesting story on Biblical Interpretation from This American Life.  The story of Reverend Carlton Pearson, a renowned evangelical pastor in Tulsa, Oklahoma, who cast aside the idea of hell, and with it, everything he'd worked for over his entire life.

 

Interpreting the Bible on Homosexuality

Here's a discussion in USA Today of the what the Bible says about homosexuality by a Baptist minister, Oliver "Buzz" Thomas, with extensive discussion by readers following the article.

 

Doing a presentation

 

Writing a Philosophy Paper